SUPREMEULTIMATE BOXING...CODEX ALIMENTARIUS

LOVE AND HIP HOP OR PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES?

Abagond makes  excellent observations about political arguements, and how they form and from whence they form.  He posits that political arguments "...at bottom about they are about right and wrong, not true and false.  So you cannot argue politics the same way you argue science, mathematics or even history."  I hold this same sentiment, that most people's political arguements stem from their emotions, how they feel about a subject more than the acutal facts of a particular political issue.  And even more politicians play to these emotions and stir the emotional pot of the general voting public. 

These television debates are little more than the usual mind capturing channel zero garbage that graces your digital airwave each week in the forms of the X Factor, Love and Hip Hop, or the Housewives of whereever.  You can insert the city of your choosing here.  I think you get my point.  The so called debates are not about informing nor are they about the candidates truly establishing their plan for your future.  They are shows.  Who looks the best while they are saying what it is they are saying.  Whomever looks better in style, character and not so much content is usually the winner.  It should take more than this for the voter to select her/his next representative but the public refuses to inform itself outside of the showmanship of the debates and the political spin by the Hannity's or Ballentine's over the airwaves.

 

Unfortunately, the misconception that we in the States live under a democracy if the first fatal informational flaw that exists and needs to be irradicated swiftly.  This is not a democracy, but a republic.  This is a nation of laws, and each candidate will tell  the public this simple fact.  We are a republic and a nation of laws and for that reason alone we as the public should take heed and begin to understand these laws.  If you remember the (s)election of November 2000 it was the Supreme Court that installed G.W. Bush as president and not the vote.  This exposed exactly what this experiment is all about.  Law.  Yet, as Deb said on the comments on her blog is (I paraphrase here) the what is most astounding is the public doesn't want to educate themselves.  Yep, ignoring the truth is bliss for them.

WAKE UP! UP YOU WAKE, UP YOU WAKE - KARDINAL OFFISHALL

Slavery's legacy has truly crushed the minds of many black people of the Western Hemisphere.  It has settled into the very bone marrow of the people affected by it. The enslavement of our people of the West was horrific, the mass transit of human bodies beyond their borders, and beyond their homes was devastating.  Yet, we survive. And merely surviving is what we believe we must do.  However, slavery in the Americas was not as simple and clear cut as presented to us.  It created and crossed many lines and barriers.  Slavery in it's urban form in the Americas was a different sort than that taught to us by films produced and directed by whites.  Slavery in our minds have been formed also by the learned scholars of our times.  People we hold in high esteem, that may have another agenda because they are sworn to a secret society that the average black man or black woman walking down any street in the U.S or even in our sister countries and surrounding islands wouldn't have the slightest idea that such societies existed and exists until this very moment.  But they do exist and many of our esteemed scholars are bound to them by taking an oath.  Somehow each time I picked up the book the Mis-Education Of The Negro, my little Angel inside would always say "put that ish down", thus I've never read the book completely.

Slavery's legacy, the story handed down to us, what we imagine now, may be quite different than that of the slavery story we hold so near and dear. Rarely do we imagine conditions of slavery in the large cities. One often conjurs up pictures of cotton plantations or possibly sugar cane fields, but snapshots in the mind of slavery in the cities is rarely imagined.  " This slavery (urban slavery) was much different from the slavery of cotton, rice and indigo plantations of rural South Carolina. Urban slavery provided much more mobility and many more work opportunities than rural slavery. Many slaves worked as skilled or semiskilled artisans, as did free African Americans. Often these artisans had as much independence and autonomy as their free African-American counterparts. A full 15 percent of the slave population lived away from their masters. These slaves hired themselves out in the city and only saw their masters once a week to collect their earnings. They had the opportunity to live away from the eye of whites and develop their own social groups with other slaves and free African Americans" The mobility of black people from the 1790's up until circa the 1840's was not what we imagined as we don't imagine slaves going no where with out a white master escorting the slave.  And still on top of white slavery there was another stage in of slavery that I would never have imagined and put into this context.   "Another group of slaves served free African-American family members and lived as de facto free."

With some nuances I feel confident that a similar form of life for black people was common in most major southern U.S. cities.  The ability of blacks to move around in major southern cities and from state to state may have been the catalyst for the strong reaction taken by black people in New Orleans when Jim Crow laws were to go into effect after Reconstruction, which led to  the creation of the Comite des Citoyens.  The Comite des Citoyens fought through the courts, all the way to the supreme court of the U.S. in the famous case of Plessy vs.. Ferguson case. The first time I truly understood what took place in this case it really blew my mind.  These black people, many of whom were quite wealthy, did not feel as if they were marginalized in 1892 by the courts even if "...Whites possessed far more legal and civil rights than free African Americans."  I suppose these black people understood that far more rights should not be interpreted as having no legal and civil rights at all.  When the Constitution of the U.S. was ratified five of the 13 colonies allowed black people to vote, and I feel confident we exercised our rights and voted.  What then has happened to us today?  Is it really Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome?  Or, are we being misled by those that look like us once again?

Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome is a theory based on a collective suffering Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.  A collective manifesting symptoms of PTSD, a theory posited by Dr. Joy DeGruy Leary.  I suppose the memory of slavery has so traumitized black people that we are suffering from some sort of collective self esteem crisis is what Dr. Leary hoped to impart on us.  It appears to me that Jim Crow laws have affected us in many ways but the continued cycling and recycling that 'a slave you were and slave you will always be' meme will, I suppose, create false memory of slavery that will in fact affect us psychologically more than the actual chattel slavery that went on.  And, sadly much of the recycling of the legacy of slavery is done by those who look like us.  It seems quite apparent to me the people that lived during the slavery time and the years following the Civil War somehow were missed with the slave you are a slave you will always be meme.  It is the recycling of this meme by other blacks whether esteemed learned scholars or people with a blog and a social media account that makes the new title Descendent of Slaves a badge of honor.  The belief in the mythological black buck being whipped by massa for being rebellious is burned into the minds of the western hemisphere Negro. Instead  the belief of  wealthy free black people could create a  group of black citizens such as the Comite des Citoyens going to court to the Supreme Court of the U.S. is seen as an impossibility. 

We are doing the most damage to ourselves.  We paint ourselves as the descendents of slaves when there is a possibility that we may not be such.  We may be the descendents of free black people and free people of colour that fought against injustices waged against our people.affluent people that may have lost/stolen farms and businesses, land and real estate property under Jim Crow laws.  I would rather not forget that under this government that we allow to perpetuate itself, that we do have legal and civil remedies right now and are not merely victims of the system.  "Free African Americans could not challenge whites politically and had to establish separate social structures, but to a great extent they could ECONOMICALLY [emphasis mine] challenge the dividing lines between themselves and whites." if we now understood that our economic power, especially today is our power, and it is power that the Most Honorable Marcus Mosiah Garvey said we need.   "It is the commercial and financial power of the United States of America that makes her the greatest banker in the world. Hence it is advisable for the Negro to get power of every kind. POWER in education, science, industry, politics and higher government. That kind of power that will stand out signally, so that other races and nations can see, and if they will not see, then FEEL."  Maybe we need to understand just what is meant by the economy of black people in the U.S. and what that really means.  However, lets not forget how the power of economy can be wield right now starting with what we buy to put into our bodies .  And how what we buy can influence what is stocked in grocery stores easily accessible by the majority black populations.

Jason Poole: On Borrowed Ground:African American Life In Charleston South Carolina, 1810 to 1860.

Marcus Mosiah Garvey: The Philosophy and Opinions of Marcus Garvey

Dr. Joy DeGruy Leary: Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome [PTSS]:America's Legacy Of Enduring Injury And Healing.

SHARPVILLE SOUTH AFRICA...AMERICAN STYLE

 

Very similar to the 1960 massacre at Sharpville Township where 69 people were murdered which included 10 children, that horrible day on March 21st, 1960, like wise 34 men were shot down by government agents.  Lonmin, the London listed company which is actually controlled by the U.S. based company Anglo American who owns Anglo Platinum pays the men the equivalent of $450.00 per month.  The miners have been protesting wages and seeking an increase that would take them up to $1250.00 per month.   This is meager on the scale of things, and yet lives have been destroyed by government agents  (Polis-Men) acting in accordance with policy shot down workers seeking to better take care of their families. 

Afri-com you say?  Who and what is Afri-Com protecting?  Concessions contract on full display?  Who owns the road that you travel?  The city? The county? Or, a multi-national corporation?  Who owns the school your child attends?  What do you own and control? 

SERENA WILLIAMS GIVES SHARAPOVA A GOOD OLD FASHIONED COMPTON BEAT DOWN!

After beating Maria Sharapova in two quick sets, 6-0 and 6-1 to take her first individual gold medal in the London 2012 Olympics, Serena banged on Sharapova and London.  Serena beat Sharapova like Sharapova stole something from her grandmother, like Maria had the audacity to slap Mama Wiliams.  Serena beat Maria Sharapova as if she were a crack head breaking into Serena's house stealing her flat screen...LOL!  Then revealing her Compton roots Serena "Walked" all over Sharapova and London.